On average,
radiation emitted from the liquid and solid surfaces of the earth is very
closely described by the Planck spectrum for a black body, at 288 K (15° C, 59°
F) (The colors you see are reflected sunlight). Actual emissivity for earth’s
surface is closer to 0.98. The red trace on Figure 1 shows the Planck spectrum
for a black body (perfect emitter/absorber, emissivity = 1) at 294 K (69.5 F).
Part of the energy radiated from the surface goes directly to space through the ‘atmospheric window’ in the approximate wavenumber range 770-1230 (13-8.13 microns) where no gas molecules (except ozone, O3) significantly absorb radiation. Over the rest of the total range of significant terrestrial radiation (wavelength 5-2000 microns, wavenumber 2000-5 cm-1) the radiation is absorbed by Long-Wave-InfraRed (LWIR) active gases (which, including water vapor, are misleadingly called greenhouse gases (ghg)).
Height of the
black line trace is the flux (energy rate) as a function of wave number at the
TOA at a single line-of-sight. This line accounts for the energy that radiates
from the surface plus that from latent and convective heat from the surface and
solar radiation absorbed by clouds and WV in the atmosphere. The vertical
distance on the graph from a curve representing radiation from the earth’s
surface to the black line indicates the amount at each wave number that the
radiation at TOA (energy rate) is less than the equivalent energy rate radiating
from the surface. Energy is conserved so the rate is what changes, i.e. the
flow of energy is slowed down as it passes through the atmosphere. The slowing
is proportional to the logarithm of the number of molecules of the responsible ghg.
At the scale of atoms, the atmosphere can be visualized as molecules bouncing elastically (no energy loss) off each other in empty space. At sea level conditions, the time between collisions for the air molecules (molecule diameter about 4 Angstroms; 4E-10 m) is extremely short, less than 0.0002 microseconds [4]. Among other properties, these collisions are the basis for thermal conduction in the gas. Therefore, electromagnetic radiation (EMR) energy absorbed by ghg molecules is immediately (within a few nanoseconds) shared with surrounding molecules both ghg and non-ghg. The sharing is thermal conduction in the gas. The process of absorbing radiation energy and sharing it with surrounding molecules is called thermalization.
Logic mandates that the elapsed time between when a molecule absorbs a photon and when it emits one must be more than zero or there would be no indication the photon had been absorbed. This elapsed time, called decay time, has been calculated for CO2 and averages from about 10 microseconds at sea level up to about 1.1 second at TOA [2, 3]. Decay time is very long compared to the relaxation time of a nanosecond or so which is the time required for thermalization to take place. I suspect that, early in thermalization, a nearby molecule of ghg is stimulated to emit a photon of the same wavelength (energy) as the one absorbed.
Power in Watts is defined as energy-rate by W = J/s where
J is energy in Joules and s is time in seconds. One Joule for one second is one
W by definition. Energy must be conserved so the rate entering the atmosphere
must be slowed. Power assessment for the atmosphere:
1. (75 W/m^2) The power entering the
atmosphere from the sun (absorbed by WV in the 1.38- and 1.97-micron bands,
2. (78 W/m^2) 3. latent heat from hydrologic
cycle,
3. (17 W/m^2) convection,
4. (382 W/m^2) radiation from the
surface at emissivity of 0.98 and T = 288 K,
5. (˗293.3 W/m^2), back radiation to
surface,
6. (˗16 W/m^2) radiation from clouds
to ground thru atmospheric window,
7. (˗40 W/m^2) radiation from surface
to space thru atmospheric window.
This all adds up to 202.7 W/m^2 of unreduced power. The photon
energy travels from ghg molecule to ghg molecule in a ‘random walk’ up thru the
atmosphere. The average path length of the ‘random walk’ is approximated by
calculation [10] to be a million 10-meter steps. This path is traversed at the
speed of light in the atmosphere in about 33 ms. This slows the energy-rate to
0.967 * 202.7 = 196 W/m^2 which matches the power leaving the atmosphere and
explains the misleadingly named GHE.
A common observation which shows that WV increase
contributes to global warming is that cloudless nights cool faster and farther when
absolute WV content of the atmosphere is lower. Clear nights cool faster and
farther in the desert than where it is humid.
In addition to the decline in WV ppmv due to temperature
decline, is the decline resulting from pressure decline with altitude of
19.4/101.1 = 0.191. The total WV molecule population gradient from surface to
tropopause is thus about 8000/203 * 101.1/19.4 = 206 to 1.
The Water Vapor Factor
Water vapor is a transparent gas
that, molecule for molecule, is more effective at absorb/emit of
earth-temperature infrared radiation (IR) than carbon dioxide (at low altitude,
absorb lines for CO2 overlap). From Jan 1988 thru Dec 2024 NASA/RSS
accurately measured and reported monthly the global average WV as Total
Precipitable Water (TPW). The anomaly data are reported at [11]. The nominal
value is about 29 kg/m^2 so the trend from Jan 1988 thru Dec 2024 is about 1.5
% per decade.
Given that at ground level
average global WV is about 0.8% or 8,000 ppmv (parts per million by volume),
the increase in WV molecules in 3.6 decades is about 0.015 * 8000 * 3.6 = 432
ppmv. From Mauna Loa data at [9] the CO2
increase in that time period is 423 - 349 = 74 ppm. Per ideal gas laws, ppm =
ppmv. With that, at ground level, WV molecules have been increasing 432/74 = 5.8
times faster than CO2 molecules. Thus, at ground level, regardless of the
initial source of warming, WV molecules have been increasing about 5.8 times
faster than CO2 molecules. The idea that CO2
starts the increase is ludicrous.
Radiation from water vapor molecules can be in
any direction but, because of the steep decline with altitude of the population
gradient of water vapor molecules, the distance traveled by a photon before it
encounters another water vapor molecule is greater towards space than towards
earth so the prevailing direction of IR flux is towards space. This is shown on
a Top of Atmosphere (TOA) graph of radiation flux vs wavenumber (wavenumber is
the number of wavelengths in a centimeter) by the jagged line below about
wavenumber 600. Because of the characteristic absorb/emit signature of every
gas, no other gas can significantly absorb or emit radiation in the wavenumber
range occupied by water vapor. The line is jagged because radiation that
reaches TOA/space is from water vapor molecules at different
temperatures/altitudes.
Fig 1.5 is a TOA graph with
overlaid constant temperature curves for black body radiation at noted
temperatures. For any specified atmosphere, these are also constant elevation
curves. The temperature and associated altitude for standard atmosphere are shown
in the upper right corner of Fig 1.5.
Figure 1.5: Typical TOA
radiant emission. (U Chicago version of MODTRAN [8]
At about 2 km and higher, the
outward directed radiation from WV can make it all the way to space. Below the
tropopause, much of the energy absorbed by CO2 and
other IR active molecules is redirected with respect to wave number via thermalization
to WV molecules. This mitigates any warming from increased CO2 in the troposphere (or any other IR active gas that does
not condense at earth temperatures).
The end result is that CO2 does not cause significant climate change, sequestering
it is an expensive mistake and the Green New Deal would have no significant
effect on climate.
Radiance calculated by MODTRAN6
MODTRAN6 [5] is
a computer program developed for the Airforce Research Laboratory which
(besides other things) can calculate the radiation flux at selected elevations
in the atmosphere for specified constituents and conditions. It contains
default values for several environments including the tropics and the 1976
Standard Atmosphere. Values for water vapor change rate and atmospheric
temperature vary with altitude for different latitudes and seasonal conditions
as shown in MODTRAN6 documentation [7].
Most of the photons emitted by the water vapor molecules are at wavelengths different from the comparatively narrow band that CO2 molecules can absorb so they are absorbed by other WV molecules. Effectively, below the tropopause, much of the terrestrial thermal radiation energy and other energy absorbed by CO2 (and other non-condensing ghg) is thermalized, redirected to, and radiated to space from water vapor.
The water vapor content of the atmosphere diminishes rapidly as the temperature decreases with increasing altitude. Above the tropopause it has declined to a level where emission from water vapor ceases to dominate and emission from CO2 molecules becomes significant. The result is most of the residual energy not emitted to space by water vapor at low altitude is, at high altitude, redirected back to the wavenumber range 600-740 cm-1 and emitted to space by CO2. The ’redirection’ is not geometric because all wavenumbers refer to photons at essentially the same line-of-sight.
Energy redirection helps explain why average global temperature tracks average global water vapor and not CO2 [6].
References:
1. NASA/GISS TOA
graph https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/2010_schmidt_05/
2. Average elapsed time to emit a photon https://sealevel.info/Happer_UNC_2014-09-08/Another_question.html
3. Average elapsed time to emit a photon http://rabett.blogspot.com/2013/04/this-is-where-eli-came-in.html
4. Time between
gas molecule collisions http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Kinetic/frecol.html
5. MODTRAN6
calculator http://modtran.spectral.com/modtran_home#plot
6. Climate
change drivers http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com
7. MODTRAN6
defaults http://modtran.spectral.com/modtran_faq
8. MODTRAN
calculator http://climatemodels.uchicago.edu/modtran/
9. Mauna
Loa data for CO2: https://www.co2.earth/monthly-co2
10. Water Vapor
vs CO2 for Planet Warming: https://watervaporandwarming.blogspot.com
11. NASA/RSS measurements thru Dec 2023 of Total Precipitable Water anomalies https://data.remss.com/vapor/monthly_1deg/old_files/tpw_v07r02_198801_202312.time_series.txt
12. Wallace and Hobbs: http://www.gnss-x.ac.cn/docs/Atmospheric%20Science%20An%20Introductory%20Survey%20(John%20M.%20Wallace,%20Peter%20V.%20Hobbs)%20(z-lib.org).pdf

